International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 1997
Outcome of delirium: Part 1. Outcome of delirium diagnosed by DSM-III-R, ICD-10 and CAMDEX and derivation of the Reversible Cognitive Dysfunction Scale among acute geriatric inpatients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Treloar A J, Macdonald A J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To study performance of DSM-III-R, ICD-10 and CAMDEX diagnoses of delirium as predictors of improvement in mental state in survivors, and to develop a brief rating scale which will predict reversibility of cognitive dysfunction.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Acute geriatric inpatient units.
PATIENTS: A random sample of consecutive acute admissions of patients over the age of 65 (N = 80).
MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Serial assessments of mental state and cognitive function and observational data. Establishment of DSM-III-R, ICD-10, CAMDEX diagnoses.
OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients with more than five points of 20% improvement in Mini Mental State Examination following the most severely impaired assessment operationally designated 'reversible cognitive dysfunction'.
MAIN RESULTS: Diagnoses of delirium by DSM-III-R and ICD-10 do not predict improvement in cognitive function well; CAMDEX does rather better. Discriminant function analysis yielded the Reversible Cognitive Dysfunction Scale (RCDS), a simple clinical scale which accurately predicted improvement. This comprised reduced conscious level, poor attention, poor contact with the patient, incoherent speech, reduced psychomotor activity, lack of awareness of surroundings and poor orientation and memory.
CONCLUSIONS: The concept of and diagnostic criteria for delirium should be reconsidered. The RCDS merits further evaluation.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Acute geriatric inpatient units.
PATIENTS: A random sample of consecutive acute admissions of patients over the age of 65 (N = 80).
MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Serial assessments of mental state and cognitive function and observational data. Establishment of DSM-III-R, ICD-10, CAMDEX diagnoses.
OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients with more than five points of 20% improvement in Mini Mental State Examination following the most severely impaired assessment operationally designated 'reversible cognitive dysfunction'.
MAIN RESULTS: Diagnoses of delirium by DSM-III-R and ICD-10 do not predict improvement in cognitive function well; CAMDEX does rather better. Discriminant function analysis yielded the Reversible Cognitive Dysfunction Scale (RCDS), a simple clinical scale which accurately predicted improvement. This comprised reduced conscious level, poor attention, poor contact with the patient, incoherent speech, reduced psychomotor activity, lack of awareness of surroundings and poor orientation and memory.
CONCLUSIONS: The concept of and diagnostic criteria for delirium should be reconsidered. The RCDS merits further evaluation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acute DiseaseAgedAged, 80 and overDeliriumDementiaDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic ErrorsDiscriminant AnalysisEvaluation Studies as TopicFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansInpatientsMaleManuals as TopicPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSampling Studies