DOI 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.08.003
[Short-term efficacy of intravitreal injection of melphalan for refractory vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma].
Аннотация
Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal chemotherapy for refractory vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma.
Methods
Retrospective series of case studies. Nine patients (13 eyes) with the diagnosis of refractory vitreous seeding were enrolled in Department of Ophthalmology of Eye& ENT Hospital of Fudan University from March 2014 to October 2015.There were 6 males and 3 females. Children aged 8 to 40 months, median age of 18 months. In the 13 eyes, 3 eyes were E period, 9 eyes were D period, and 1 eyes were C period. The fundus was examined by indirect ophthalmoscope and recorded by RetcamIII. Systemic chemotherapy was performed using the VEC protocol, that is vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin. Local treatment also involves cryotherapy and/or thermotherapy. All patients were treated with intravitreal injection of melphalan. They underwent intravitreal melphalan, once every 4 weeks, with an average of 3 times of injections. The treatment dose of melphalan is 20 to 40 μg per dose. Observe the vitreous seed control and complications of therapy.
Results
Vitreous seeds control was attained in all cases. There was no case of orbital extension or remote metastasis. Complications included retinal pigment epithelial and choroidal atrophy in 7 eyes, pupillary synechia and iris atrophy in 2 eyes,retinal vasculitis and vascular occlusion in 2 eyes, optic atrophy in 2 eyes, vitreous hemorrhage in 1 eye, and temporary hypotony in 3 eyes.
Conclusions
Intravitreal melphalan is an effective treatment for refractory vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma. High dose may lead to local adverse reactions. (Chin J Ophthalmol, 2017, 53: 570-574).
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.