BMC pediatrics · 2021
Optimization of pediatric CT scans in a developing country.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kamdem Fotso Eddy, Ngano Samba Odette, Alla Takam Clemence, Fotue Alain Jervé, Abogo Serge, Fai Cornellius Lukong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess scan parameters and to propose strategies to optimize the examinations of children (from 0 to 15 years old) on adult scanners in developing countries.
METHODS: A study was done in 2015 and 2018 on 312 pediatric patients to verify improved practices. The study of 2015 ended with proposed strategies. Dose and scan parameters were available for prospective dose analysis. These strategies were implemented in a study of 2018.
RESULTS: Amount the CT examinations study in this paper, the common was head trauma (90 %). For every pediatric CT scan in 2015, a kV of 120 was used in the various hospitals. The mAs ranged from 57.75 to 283.33, slice thicknesses from 1.25 to 2.5 mm and pitch from 0.525 to 1.375 mm. In the study of 2018, implementing the strategy defined in the methodology and proposed in 2015: CTDIVol decreased by 21.27 % for children < 1 year, 31.97 % for children 1-4 years, 17 % for children 5-9 years. DLP also decreased by 25.14 %, 36.29 % and 19.85 % for children < 1 year, 1-4 years and 5-9 years respectively. Children were exposed to ionizing radiation on machines designed for adults, but now the doses received by children are reduced.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of doses during the pediatric CT examination is possible with the introduction of new optimization protocols or the acquisition of a new machine with a pediatric protocol.
METHODS: A study was done in 2015 and 2018 on 312 pediatric patients to verify improved practices. The study of 2015 ended with proposed strategies. Dose and scan parameters were available for prospective dose analysis. These strategies were implemented in a study of 2018.
RESULTS: Amount the CT examinations study in this paper, the common was head trauma (90 %). For every pediatric CT scan in 2015, a kV of 120 was used in the various hospitals. The mAs ranged from 57.75 to 283.33, slice thicknesses from 1.25 to 2.5 mm and pitch from 0.525 to 1.375 mm. In the study of 2018, implementing the strategy defined in the methodology and proposed in 2015: CTDIVol decreased by 21.27 % for children < 1 year, 31.97 % for children 1-4 years, 17 % for children 5-9 years. DLP also decreased by 25.14 %, 36.29 % and 19.85 % for children < 1 year, 1-4 years and 5-9 years respectively. Children were exposed to ionizing radiation on machines designed for adults, but now the doses received by children are reduced.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of doses during the pediatric CT examination is possible with the introduction of new optimization protocols or the acquisition of a new machine with a pediatric protocol.