Tumori · 2015
The OECI model: the experience of INT Milan with a focus on the integration of psycho-oncology support.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Roli Anna, Borreani Claudia, Bosisio Marco, Bianchi Elisabetta, Montefusco Vittorio, Gobbi Giorgia, Platania Marco, Lavecchia Filomena, Milanesi Marco, Anselmi Valeria, Melani Cecilia, De Leo Giuseppe
Аннотация
The procedure for Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI) accreditation identified the formation of MDTs for the diagnosis and scheduling of primary treatment with integration of supportive care as a key strength at Istituto Nazionale Tumori (INT). The opportunities for improvement highlighted by the OECI peer review inspired a study on the evaluation of psychological distress, with a view to integrating this evaluation into global patient management and to defining standardized criteria for the provision of psychological services. This article describes the OECI accreditation experience at INT and the study conducted between January and May 2015 on the evaluation of patients' distress levels during cancer treatment, defining a score-based cutoff point that triggers the intervention of a psychologist. The Distress Thermometer was used as a tool for evaluating psychological distress, performed by nurses on admitting the patient. A total of 261 questionnaires were completed by patients admitted to the medical oncology and hematology departments, with an average distress value of 4.1, and 60% of patients experiencing clinically detectable emotional distress. Emotion-related problems had a significant association with a greater level of distress, while there were few reports of relationship issues as a cause of distress. As a result of the improvement initiative supported by the psychological distress evaluation study, we validated the screening questionnaire to be included at the initial patient evaluation stage with a cutoff point triggering the intervention by a psychologist at a score of ≥7.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Academies and InstitutesAccreditationActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedCancer Care FacilitiesCertificationFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsItalyMaleMedical OncologyMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPatient Care TeamQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareRoleSpiritualityStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnaires