Journal of reconstructive microsurgery · 1990
Initial evaluation of variable graft lengths and lesion lengths in the repair of nerve gaps.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kim D H, Connolly S E, Voorhies R M, Beuerman R W, Kline D G
Аннотация
This experiment evaluated the electrical and histologic differences between two groups of rats, one of which underwent same-length bilateral resection of posterior tibial nerves prior to being repaired with grafts of different lengths, while the other group underwent different-length resections with same-length graft repair. In this rat model, 18 animals were used and divided into two groups. The first group of animals underwent bilateral resection of 8-mm segments of posterior tibial nerve. To repair these nerves, one leg received two 8-mm sural nerve grafts (Group A), while the other leg received two 16-mm sural nerve grafts (Group B). The second group of rats underwent posterior tibial nerve resections of 8 mm and 16 mm, respectively. The leg with the 8 mm of posterior tibial nerve resected, received two side-by-side 16-mm sural nerve grafts (Group C); the other leg with 16 mm resected, received two 16-mm sural nerve grafts (Group D). Electrophysiologic comparison of nerve conduction velocity for Groups A and B showed a significant difference (p less than 0.05), as did the same comparison for Groups C and D (p less than 0.05). Histologic studies showed that Groups A and D had marked extrafascicular escape of the regenerating nerve axons, disorganizational growth of minifascicles, and loss of integrity of the donor fascicles, while Groups B and C had very minimal extrafascicular escape of regenerating axons.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)