Neurology · 2023
Validation Study of the MDS Criteria for the Diagnosis of Multiple System Atrophy in the Mayo Clinic Brain Bank.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sekiya Hiroaki, Koga Shunsuke, Murakami Aya, Kawazoe Miki, Kim Minji, Martin Nicholas B, Uitti Ryan J, Cheshire William P, Wszolek Zbigniew K, Dickson Dennis W
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The second consensus criteria in 2008 have been used in diagnosing multiple system atrophy (MSA). The International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society (MDS) proposed new diagnostic criteria for MSA in 2022. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy between these 2 criteria and validate the clinical utility of the newly proposed criteria for MSA.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective autopsy cohort study of consecutive patients with a clinical or pathologic diagnosis of MSA from the Mayo Clinic brain bank between 1998 and 2021. We studied 352 patients (250 pathologically diagnosed MSA and 102 non-MSA); MDS criteria and the second consensus criteria were applied. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves were compared between these criteria. Comparison was conducted between clinical subtypes and among clinically challenging cases (those with different clinical diagnoses or those with suspected but undiagnosed MSA before death). We also used machine learning algorithm, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, to identify clinical features contributing diagnostic performance.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of clinically established and probable MSA by the MDS criteria were 16% and 99% and 64% and 74%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of probable MSA and possible MSA by the second consensus criteria were 72% and 52% and 93% and 21%, respectively. The AUC of MDS clinically probable MSA was the highest (0.69). The diagnostic performance did not differ between clinical subtypes. In clinically challenging cases, MDS clinically established MSA maintained high specificity and MDS clinically probable MSA demonstrated the highest AUC (0.62). MRI findings contributed to high specificity. In addition, combining core clinical features with 2 or more from any of the 13 supporting features and the absence of exclusion criteria also yielded high specificity. Among supporting features, rapid progression was most important for predicting MSA pathology.
DISCUSSION: The MDS criteria showed high specificity with clinically established MSA and moderate sensitivity and specificity with clinically probable MSA. The observation that high specificity could be achieved with clinical features alone suggests that MSA diagnosis with high specificity is possible even in areas where MRI is not readily available.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective autopsy cohort study of consecutive patients with a clinical or pathologic diagnosis of MSA from the Mayo Clinic brain bank between 1998 and 2021. We studied 352 patients (250 pathologically diagnosed MSA and 102 non-MSA); MDS criteria and the second consensus criteria were applied. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curves were compared between these criteria. Comparison was conducted between clinical subtypes and among clinically challenging cases (those with different clinical diagnoses or those with suspected but undiagnosed MSA before death). We also used machine learning algorithm, eXtreme Gradient Boosting, to identify clinical features contributing diagnostic performance.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of clinically established and probable MSA by the MDS criteria were 16% and 99% and 64% and 74%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of probable MSA and possible MSA by the second consensus criteria were 72% and 52% and 93% and 21%, respectively. The AUC of MDS clinically probable MSA was the highest (0.69). The diagnostic performance did not differ between clinical subtypes. In clinically challenging cases, MDS clinically established MSA maintained high specificity and MDS clinically probable MSA demonstrated the highest AUC (0.62). MRI findings contributed to high specificity. In addition, combining core clinical features with 2 or more from any of the 13 supporting features and the absence of exclusion criteria also yielded high specificity. Among supporting features, rapid progression was most important for predicting MSA pathology.
DISCUSSION: The MDS criteria showed high specificity with clinically established MSA and moderate sensitivity and specificity with clinically probable MSA. The observation that high specificity could be achieved with clinical features alone suggests that MSA diagnosis with high specificity is possible even in areas where MRI is not readily available.