Diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis using fine needle aspiration biopsy.

BACKGROUND

Tuberculous lymphadenitis is the commonest form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis. However, the optimal approach to diagnosis, employing biopsy by either fine needle aspiration (FNA) or surgical excision, remains uncertain.

AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic value of biopsy using each of the component diagnostic modalities of FNA (microscopy, cytology and culture), and compare these with excision biopsy in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis in a predominantly migrant population in Melbourne.

METHODS

A retrospective examination of tuberculous lymphadenitis cases presenting to Western Health over 12 years was conducted. Using a reference method of positive culture of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the diagnostic sensitivities of each modality employed in FNA were determined.

RESULTS

Forty-two subjects having FNA and 30 having excision biopsy as the initial investigation were compared. Among specimens obtained by FNA, sensitivity of microscopy was 18% (95% confidence interval (CI): 5–40%) and sensitivity of cytology was 38% (95% CI: 20–59%). For specimens obtained by excision biopsies, sensitivities for microscopy and histology were 17% (95% CI: 2–32%) and 96% (95% CI: 88–100%) respectively. Sensitivity of culture performed on FNA specimens was 86% (95% CI: 65–97%).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the relatively high sensitivity of mycobacterial cultures from FNA, this study supports its routine use as the initial investigation in most patients with suspected tuberculous lymphadenitis. Microscopy and cytology add relatively little to the clinical utility of FNA