MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.002

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2007

Pure word deafness due to left subcortical lesion: neurophysiological studies of two patients.

Hayashi Kazuko, Hayashi Ryoichi

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

This study investigated the auditory processing in two patients with pure word deafness (PWD) using neurophysiological experimental methods.

METHODS

We recorded the auditory brainstem response (ABR), the middle latency auditory-evoked response (MLR) and the auditory-evoked event-related potentials (ERPs) in two patients with PWD after subcortical hemorrhage in the left temporal lobe.

RESULTS

Both patients showed normal response in ABR and abnormality in MLR. The latency of P300 evoked by right-ear stimulation was 51 ms longer in one patient and 26 ms longer in the other patient than that evoked by left-ear stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that the prolongation of P300 latency could be caused by the deterioration of auditory stimulus processing and supported the hypothesis that the defect in auditory temporal resolution was an important factor in the development of PWD.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrated that recordings of ERP with auditory-evoked response such as ABR and MLR are useful to elucidate the deterioration of auditory stimulus processing in patients with PWD.

Для цитирования: Hayashi Kazuko, Hayashi Ryoichi. Pure word deafness due to left subcortical lesion: neurophysiological studies of two patients.. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.01.002.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.