Journal of gerontological nursing · 2026
Readability and Linguistic Characteristics of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Prevention, Symptom, and Treatment Information from Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bautista John Robert, Goth Olivia, Anbari Allison B, Powell Kimberly R
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the readability and linguistic characteristics of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) prevention, symptom, and treatment information from generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots.
METHOD: We analyzed 66 outputs from free-to-use GenAI chatbots. We extracted readability (word count, Fleisch Reading Ease, and Fleisch-Kincaid Grade Level) and linguistic scores (analytical thinking, clout, authenticity, and emotional tone) using Microsoft Word and the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t tests, analysis of variance, and multivariate analysis of variance.
RESULTS: ADRD information from GenAI chatbots, especially treatment information, had college-level readability. Linguistic analyses indicate a high analytical thinking score and low scores for clout, authenticity, and emotional tone.
CONCLUSION: Our sample of ADRD GenAI information exceeded recommended reading levels for patient education materials. Although the outputs exhibited logical thinking, they also included uncertain, inauthentic, and negative tones. ADRD caregivers should be aware of these characteristics when using GenAI chatbots for ADRD information-seeking.
METHOD: We analyzed 66 outputs from free-to-use GenAI chatbots. We extracted readability (word count, Fleisch Reading Ease, and Fleisch-Kincaid Grade Level) and linguistic scores (analytical thinking, clout, authenticity, and emotional tone) using Microsoft Word and the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t tests, analysis of variance, and multivariate analysis of variance.
RESULTS: ADRD information from GenAI chatbots, especially treatment information, had college-level readability. Linguistic analyses indicate a high analytical thinking score and low scores for clout, authenticity, and emotional tone.
CONCLUSION: Our sample of ADRD GenAI information exceeded recommended reading levels for patient education materials. Although the outputs exhibited logical thinking, they also included uncertain, inauthentic, and negative tones. ADRD caregivers should be aware of these characteristics when using GenAI chatbots for ADRD information-seeking.