MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/jar.12798

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2020

Risk of forced marriage amongst people with learning disabilities in the UK: Perspectives of South Asian carers.

McCarthy Michelle, Clawson Rachael, Patterson Anne, Fyson Rachel, Khan Luftha

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

People with intellectual disabilities are at increased risk of forced marriage compared to those without intellectual disabilities. In the UK, this risk is particularly, though not exclusively, associated with South Asian communities and is linked to the desire to secure long-term care.

METHOD: Focus groups and semi-structured interviews were undertaken with South Asian parents and family carers (n = 22) of adults with intellectual disability and the resultant data thematically analysed.

RESULTS

Although securing care for their intellectually disabled relative was identified as a key motivator for forced marriage, other important themes also emerged. These included cultural and religious beliefs about disability and marriage, and limited understanding of relevant laws. Factors militating against forced marriage were also identified, including fears of abuse and neglect.

CONCLUSIONS

Implications for the provision of services and the need for improved access to information on forced marriage of people with intellectual disabilities are highlighted.

Для цитирования: McCarthy Michelle, Clawson Rachael, Patterson Anne, Fyson Rachel, Khan Luftha. Risk of forced marriage amongst people with learning disabilities in the UK: Perspectives of South Asian carers.. Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID. 2020. DOI: 10.1111/jar.12798.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.