Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2015
Buried Probe in Complex Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstructions: Clinical Profiles and Outcomes.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gupta Adit, Kamal Saurabh, Javed Ali Mohammad, Naik Milind N
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report the clinical profiles and outcomes of buried probe variant of complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients endoscopically diagnosed as a buried probe variant of complex CNLDO, over a 3.5 year period from a single surgeon's (MJA) database were included in the study. A detailed lacrimal system evaluation was performed and intraoperative findings including nasal endoscopy were documented. A minimum follow up of 3 months following the final intervention was considered for analysis. Anatomical and functional success of the interventions was assessed at the final follow up.
RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes of 21 patients with buried probes were studied. The mean age at presentations was 41.2 months. Epiphora and discharge were the commonest presenting symptoms noted in 77.2% (17/22). Associated lacrimal anomalies include punctal agenesis, incomplete punctal canalization and atonic lacrimal sac. All patients underwent irrigation and probing under nasal endoscopic guidance. Further, 3 patients underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for persistent CNLDO. At a mean follow up of 4.9 months, the final anatomical and functional successes were noted in 90.9% and 81.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Buried probe is a variant of complex CNLDO, noted more commonly in older children. Endoscopic guidance is crucial for its diagnosis and satisfactory outcomes.
METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients endoscopically diagnosed as a buried probe variant of complex CNLDO, over a 3.5 year period from a single surgeon's (MJA) database were included in the study. A detailed lacrimal system evaluation was performed and intraoperative findings including nasal endoscopy were documented. A minimum follow up of 3 months following the final intervention was considered for analysis. Anatomical and functional success of the interventions was assessed at the final follow up.
RESULTS: Twenty-two eyes of 21 patients with buried probes were studied. The mean age at presentations was 41.2 months. Epiphora and discharge were the commonest presenting symptoms noted in 77.2% (17/22). Associated lacrimal anomalies include punctal agenesis, incomplete punctal canalization and atonic lacrimal sac. All patients underwent irrigation and probing under nasal endoscopic guidance. Further, 3 patients underwent endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy for persistent CNLDO. At a mean follow up of 4.9 months, the final anatomical and functional successes were noted in 90.9% and 81.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Buried probe is a variant of complex CNLDO, noted more commonly in older children. Endoscopic guidance is crucial for its diagnosis and satisfactory outcomes.