MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s1051-0443(94)71470-6

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR · 1994

Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy: results and complications.

Lee W J, Patel U, Patel S, Pillari G P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: Percutaneous nephrostomy is a well-established standardized procedure in the management of patients with various urologic problems. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of percutaneous nephrostomy in an emergency setting.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy was performed in 160 patients with ages ranging from 2 to 89 years (mean, 52 years). Access to the kidney was planned and achieved with C-arm fluoroscopic guidance.

RESULTS

The initial technical success rate was 98%. Overall complication rate was 34%; 6% were major and 28% were minor. Major procedure-related complications, including sepsis, occurred in 6% of patients. Hematuria requiring transfusion was noted in 2.4% of patients. Minor complications included catheter displacement or malposition (4.8%), pelvic perforation (4.3%), paralytic ileus (2.4%), pneumonia/atelectasis (1.8%), and pleural effusion (1.2%). High-risk patients included those with diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. No deaths or significant morbidity resulted from any complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy under fluoroscopic guidance is a simple, safe, and effective procedure and should be offered in all suitably equipped radiology departments.

Для цитирования: Lee W J, Patel U, Patel S, Pillari G P. Emergency percutaneous nephrostomy: results and complications.. Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR. 1994. DOI: 10.1016/s1051-0443(94)71470-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.