MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.005

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of endodontics · 2008

RETRACTED: The evaluation of computed tomography scans and ultrasounds in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions.

Aggarwal Vivek, Logani Ajay, Shah Naseem

Сравнительное исследованиеОценочное исследованиеСтатьяОтозванная публикацияПеревод пока не подготовлен
Источник пометил публикацию как отозванную.

Аннотация

Traditionally, the definitive diagnosis of periapical lesion depends on histopathological examination of the tissues, which is impractical in cases planned for nonsurgical treatment. Recently, some authors have used ultrasound with power Doppler and computed tomography in differential diagnosis between a cyst and a granuloma. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the use of computed tomography (CT) scan and ultrasound with power Doppler flowmetry in differential diagnosis of periapical lesions. Twelve periapical lesions were imaged with the help of CT scans and ultrasound with color-power Doppler flowmetry. A provisional preoperative diagnosis was made based on history, clinical presentation, and radiographic features. The cases were treated by surgical endodontics. In all 12 cases, the diagnosis with CT scan and ultrasound coincided with the histopathological diagnosis of the lesions. It is proposed that CT scans and ultrasound with power Doppler flowmetry can provide an additional dignostic tool without invasive surgery, where treatment option is nonsurgical.

Для цитирования: Aggarwal Vivek, Logani Ajay, Shah Naseem. RETRACTED: The evaluation of computed tomography scans and ultrasounds in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions.. Journal of endodontics. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.08.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.