Ophthalmic surgery and lasers · 1997
Hydroxyapatite implantation with scleral quadrisection after evisceration.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yang J G, Khwarg S I, Wee W R, Kim D M, Lee J H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In contrast to the literature on enucleation, reports of hydroxyapatite (HA) implantation during evisceration are limited; however, those that have been published mention the high HA exposure rate. The authors examined the scleral quadrisection procedure to evaluate its effect on cosmetic appearance and the prevention of HA exposure after evisceration.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors analyzed the surgical outcomes of 17 patients who had undergone an HA implantation with scleral quadrisection after evisceration between November 1994 and November 1995.
RESULTS: In each case, the authors were able to use HA implants of 18 mm or more. During follow-up (average 10.7 months), there were no cases of conjunctival erosion, HA exposure, implant migration, significant enophthalmos, or superior sulcus deformity. All of the patients, 7 of whom had a ball- and-socket prosthesis, were satisfied with their cosmetic appearance and prosthetic motility. More than 11 weeks after evisceration, all 10 studied patients had complete, round uptakes with orbital bone SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography).
CONCLUSION: For good cosmetic appearance and for the prevention of implant exposure, scleral quadrisection is a safe and effective procedure for HA implantation after evisceration.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: The authors analyzed the surgical outcomes of 17 patients who had undergone an HA implantation with scleral quadrisection after evisceration between November 1994 and November 1995.
RESULTS: In each case, the authors were able to use HA implants of 18 mm or more. During follow-up (average 10.7 months), there were no cases of conjunctival erosion, HA exposure, implant migration, significant enophthalmos, or superior sulcus deformity. All of the patients, 7 of whom had a ball- and-socket prosthesis, were satisfied with their cosmetic appearance and prosthetic motility. More than 11 weeks after evisceration, all 10 studied patients had complete, round uptakes with orbital bone SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography).
CONCLUSION: For good cosmetic appearance and for the prevention of implant exposure, scleral quadrisection is a safe and effective procedure for HA implantation after evisceration.