MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica · 1996

Topical clobetasol propionate compared with placebo in the treatment of unretractable foreskin.

Lindhagen T

Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether it is the steroid alone or the gentle physical retraction combined with ointment that is responsible for the excellent results observed with topical steroid treatment of unretractable foreskin.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomised, double-blind study.

SETTING

University hospital, Sweden.

SUBJECTS: 30 Boys randomised to be treated with clobetasol propionate (n = 15) or placebo (n = 15).

INTERVENTIONS: The boys were examined 1, 2 and 6 months, respectively, after treatment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison between the effects of clobetasol propionate and placebo.

RESULTS

Two patients in the steroid group and one in the placebo group withdrew from the study. 10 Boys in the steroid group showed an improvement within 2 months. The remaining 3 boys had no effect and were circumcised. Histopathological examination showed lichen sclerosus et atrophicus. Seven boys in the placebo group improved. The 7 non-responders were prescribed clobetasol propionate ointment, and all 7 improved.

CONCLUSION

17 of 27 boys referred with "phimosis" were successfully treated with an ointment and gentle traction. When clobetasol propionate was given the non-responders success rate was increased to 24/27 (89%).

Для цитирования: Lindhagen T. Topical clobetasol propionate compared with placebo in the treatment of unretractable foreskin.. The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica. 1996.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.