MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacl.2025.05.003

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical lipidology · 2025

Global disparities in access to lipid-lowering therapies for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia - A physician survey.

Schonck Willemijn A M, Mulder Janneke W C M, Tromp Tycho R, Reeskamp Laurens F, Hovingh G Kees, van Lennep Jeanine E Roeters, Blom Dirk J

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Lipid levels and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) outcomes have been shown to differ globally in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH), which may be related to availability and accessibility of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT).

OBJECTIVE

In the current study, we investigated global disparities in availability and accessibility of LLTs for patients with HoFH.

METHODS

Physicians participating in the HoFH International Clinical Collaborators (HICC, NCT04815005) were invited to complete an online survey on registration status, reimbursement, and access to various LLTs. Responses were compared between high-income and non-high-income countries.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 87 physicians (64.4% from high-income countries). Physicians from high-income countries reported significantly higher registration rates for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 monoclonal antibodies (PCSK9 mAbs) (96.4% vs 51.6%), lomitapide (83.6% vs 9.7%), evinacumab (69.1% vs 0.0%), colesevelam (50.0% vs 3.2%), and lipoprotein-apheresis (96.4% vs 45.2%). Public sector reimbursement was also more common in high-income countries for PCSK9 mAbs (90.9% vs 24.1%), lomitapide (74.5% vs 3.4%), evinacumab (60.0% vs 0.0%), colesevelam (40.0% vs 3.4%), and lipoprotein-apheresis (94.5% vs 37.9%). Access to LLTs was also higher in high-income countries for statins (91.1% vs 61.3%), ezetimibe (87.5% vs 38.7%), PCSK9 mAbs (53.6% vs 6.5%), lomitapide (32.% vs 0.0%), evinacumab (32.1% vs 3.2%), colesevelam (39.3% vs 3.2%), and lipoprotein-apheresis (57.1% vs 3.2%).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm significant global disparities in LLT registration, reimbursement, and access between high-income and non-high-income countries. Improving LLT availability and accessibility, particularly in non-high-income countries, is essential to improve outcomes in patients with HoFH.

Для цитирования: Schonck Willemijn A M, Mulder Janneke W C M, Tromp Tycho R, Reeskamp Laurens F, Hovingh G Kees, van Lennep Jeanine E Roeters, Blom Dirk J. Global disparities in access to lipid-lowering therapies for patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia - A physician survey.. Journal of clinical lipidology. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacl.2025.05.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.