Journal of surgical oncology · 2019
Preventive effects of a synthetic absorbable antiadhesive film (seprafilm) on small bowel obstruction in patients who underwent elective surgery for colon cancer: A randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saito Gota, Sadahiro Sotaro, Ogimi Takashi, Miyakita Hiroshi, Okada Kazutake, Tanaka Akira, Suzuki Toshiyuki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Seprafilm did not decrease small bowel obstruction (SBO), but significantly decreased reoperation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, the preventive effect in colon cancer remains unclear.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in patients with colon cancer. The study group comprised 345 patients with colon cancer. In the seprafilm group (n = 166), two sheets of seprafilm were inserted under a midline incision. Patients who were admitted and required decompression were considered to have SBO.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 61.9 months. Patient characteristics were well balanced. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SBO between the seprafilm group (7.8%) and the control group (10.6%) (P = .46). In patients who underwent reoperation, SBO occurred in a midline incision in one patient and at other sites in four patients in the seprafilm group as compared with two patients and five patients, respectively, in the control group. Multivariate analysis showed that only a history of laparotomy was an independent risk factor for SBO.
CONCLUSIONS: Seprafilm did not decrease SBO or reoperation in colon cancer. The incidence of SBO caused by adhesion to the midline incision was relatively low as compared with that caused by adhesion to other sites.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial in patients with colon cancer. The study group comprised 345 patients with colon cancer. In the seprafilm group (n = 166), two sheets of seprafilm were inserted under a midline incision. Patients who were admitted and required decompression were considered to have SBO.
RESULTS: The median follow-up was 61.9 months. Patient characteristics were well balanced. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SBO between the seprafilm group (7.8%) and the control group (10.6%) (P = .46). In patients who underwent reoperation, SBO occurred in a midline incision in one patient and at other sites in four patients in the seprafilm group as compared with two patients and five patients, respectively, in the control group. Multivariate analysis showed that only a history of laparotomy was an independent risk factor for SBO.
CONCLUSIONS: Seprafilm did not decrease SBO or reoperation in colon cancer. The incidence of SBO caused by adhesion to the midline incision was relatively low as compared with that caused by adhesion to other sites.