MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/07448481.2023.2228428

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2023

Mental health literacy and relational health literacy among college students.

Tambling Rachel R, D'Aniello Carissa

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Objective

The aim of the present study was to examine MHL and RHL in a sample of college students in the United States, and to explore linkages among literacies and related constructs.

Participants

Participants were 169 (N = 169) participants who were adult college students at a state university in the southern United States. Participants were recruited through an online recruitment management system that allows college students to participate in research studies for participation credit. Method: We analyzed online survey data using descriptive analysis. In effort to develop a measurement tool to measure relational mental health literacy, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis on the Relational Health Literacy Scale (RHLS) that was developed for the present study.

Results

Results suggest that college students would be willing to seek mental health resources from some professional sources. Participants were able to more easily identify symptoms of anxiety and depression, and struggled to accurately identify symptoms of mania, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Respondents also demonstrated some awareness of relationship health issues.

Conclusions

Implications for further research, practice and policy making are presented and discussed.

Для цитирования: Tambling Rachel R, D'Aniello Carissa. Mental health literacy and relational health literacy among college students.. Journal of American college health : J of ACH. 2023. DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2023.2228428.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.