Assessment of clinical case-definition for HIV/AIDS in Tanzania.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the usefulness of World Health Organisation (WHO's) clinical case-definition (CCD) for AIDS in a private hospital.
DESIGN
A prospective study.
SETTING
Shree Hindu Mandal Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
SUBJECTS: A total of 601 patients (> 14 years) were studied from January 1995 to December 1997.
METHODS
Using HIV test results as a reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV) and negative predictive values of signs and symptoms were calculated. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine a set of predictive symptoms and signs. Stepwise logistic regression modelling was used to choose the final model.
RESULTS
The frequently occurring signs and symptoms among the 473 sero-positive patients were fever (226), oral candidiasis (167), weight loss (161), chronic cough (157), diarrhoea (100) and pulmonary tuberculosis in 69 cases. The presence of anorectal lesions and the rarity of pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in this study are important findings. Seven clinical characteristics predicted HIV infection. These included pulmonary tuberculosis (p=0.009), lymphadenopathy (p=0.007), diarrhoea (p=0.000), chronic cough (p=0.001), dermatitis (p=0.003), herpes zoster (p=0.01) and oral candidiasis (p=0.000).
CONCLUSIONS
A greater number of HIV positive patients presented with signs and symptoms different from those proposed by WHO's CCD were observed in this study. With environmental pathogens varying from one geographical region to another and new ones appearing, opportunistic disease cannot be constant in AIDS patients. Therefore, AIDS diagnosis based on clinical case definition alone without at least one positive HIV antibody test is inaccurate and no longer justified.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.