Journal of neurology · 2024
Diagnosing primary lateral sclerosis: a clinico-pathological study.
СтатьяКлинический случайНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
de Boer Eva M J, de Vries Bálint S, Van Hecke Wim, Mühlebner Angelika, Vincken Koen L, Mol Christian P, van Rheenen Wouter, Westeneng Henk-Jan, Veldink Jan H, Höglinger Günter U, Morris Huw R, Litvan Irene, Raaphorst Joost, Ticozzi Nicola, Corcia Philippe, Vandenberghe Wim, Pijnenburg Yolande A L, Seelaar Harro, Ingre Caroline, Van Damme Philip, van den Berg Leonard H, van de Warrenburg Bart P C, van Es Michael A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is a rare motor neuron disease characterized by upper motor neuron degeneration, diagnosed clinically due to the absence of a (neuropathological) gold standard. Post-mortem studies, particularly TDP-43 pathology analysis, are limited.
METHODS: This study reports on 5 cases in which the diagnostic criteria for PLS were met, but in which neuropathology findings showed (partially) conflicting results. These discrepancies prompted us to perform a clinico-pathology study focussing on diagnostic challenges and accuracy in PLS. To this end, all cases were reviewed by an international panel of 11 experts using an e-module and structured questionnaires.
RESULTS: Autopsy exhibited neuropathological findings consistent with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in one case, while two cases exhibited similar, but more limited lower motor neuron involvement, hinting at PLS or ALS overlap. Another case displayed tau-pathology indicative of progressive supranuclear palsy. The final case displayed extensive myelin loss without a proteinopathy or a clear diagnosis. The expert panel identified 24 different ancillary investigations lacking across cases (e.g. genetic testing, DAT scans, neuropsychological evaluation), listed 28 differential diagnoses, and identified 13 different conditions as the most likely diagnosis. Autopsy results led panel members to change their final diagnosis in 42% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the diagnostic challenges posed by diverse underlying pathologies resulting in upper motor neuron phenotypes. Despite adhering to the same diagnostic criteria, consensus amongst experts was limited. Ensuring the diagnostic consistency is crucial for advancing understanding and treatment of PLS. Explicit guidelines for excluding potential mimics along with a neuropathological gold standard are imperative.
METHODS: This study reports on 5 cases in which the diagnostic criteria for PLS were met, but in which neuropathology findings showed (partially) conflicting results. These discrepancies prompted us to perform a clinico-pathology study focussing on diagnostic challenges and accuracy in PLS. To this end, all cases were reviewed by an international panel of 11 experts using an e-module and structured questionnaires.
RESULTS: Autopsy exhibited neuropathological findings consistent with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in one case, while two cases exhibited similar, but more limited lower motor neuron involvement, hinting at PLS or ALS overlap. Another case displayed tau-pathology indicative of progressive supranuclear palsy. The final case displayed extensive myelin loss without a proteinopathy or a clear diagnosis. The expert panel identified 24 different ancillary investigations lacking across cases (e.g. genetic testing, DAT scans, neuropsychological evaluation), listed 28 differential diagnoses, and identified 13 different conditions as the most likely diagnosis. Autopsy results led panel members to change their final diagnosis in 42% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This study underscores the diagnostic challenges posed by diverse underlying pathologies resulting in upper motor neuron phenotypes. Despite adhering to the same diagnostic criteria, consensus amongst experts was limited. Ensuring the diagnostic consistency is crucial for advancing understanding and treatment of PLS. Explicit guidelines for excluding potential mimics along with a neuropathological gold standard are imperative.