Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2019
Brain and spinal MRI features distinguishing MS from different AQP4 antibody serostatus NMOSD at disease onset in a cohort of Latin American patients.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Carnero Contentti Edgar, Marques Vanessa Daccach, Soto de Castillo Ibis, Tkachuk Verónica, Barreira Amilton Antunes, Caride Alejandro, Castillo Maria C, Cristiano Edgardo, de Aquino Cruz Camila, Braga Diégues Serva Gabriel, Santos Antonio Carlos Dos, Labarca Rossanny, Lavigne Moreira Carolina, López Pablo A, Miguez Jimena, Molina Omaira, Pettinicchi Juan Pablo, Rojas Juan Ignacio
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) previously used criteria (Matthews's criteria, MC) for differentiating multiple sclerosis (MS) from neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) in Caucasian and non-Caucasian populations (Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela) with positive (P-NMOSD), negative (N-NMOSD), and unknown (U-NMOSD) aquaporin-4 antibody serostatus at disease onset and to assess the added diagnostic value of spinal cord MRI in these populations.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records, and MRIs were assessed by two blinded evaluators and were scored using MC. Short-segment transverse myelitis (STM) was added as a new criterion. MC sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined.
RESULTS: We included 282 patients (MS = 188 and NMOSD = 94). MC applied to the entire cohort showed 97.8% sensitivity, 82.9% specificity, 92.0% PPV, and 95.1% NPV for differentiating MS from NMOSD. A subanalysis applied only to non-Caucasian (MS = 89 and NMOSD = 47) showed 100% sensitivity, 80.8% specificity, 90.8% PPV, and 100% NPV. Similar sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MC for MS versus P-NMOSD (n = 55), N-NMOSD (n = 28), and U-NMOSD (n = 21) were observed.
CONCLUSION: MC distinguished MS from NMOSD of all serostatus in a Latin American cohort that included non-Caucasian populations. Addition of STM to MC did not raise the accuracy significantly.
METHODS: We reviewed medical records, and MRIs were assessed by two blinded evaluators and were scored using MC. Short-segment transverse myelitis (STM) was added as a new criterion. MC sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined.
RESULTS: We included 282 patients (MS = 188 and NMOSD = 94). MC applied to the entire cohort showed 97.8% sensitivity, 82.9% specificity, 92.0% PPV, and 95.1% NPV for differentiating MS from NMOSD. A subanalysis applied only to non-Caucasian (MS = 89 and NMOSD = 47) showed 100% sensitivity, 80.8% specificity, 90.8% PPV, and 100% NPV. Similar sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of MC for MS versus P-NMOSD (n = 55), N-NMOSD (n = 28), and U-NMOSD (n = 21) were observed.
CONCLUSION: MC distinguished MS from NMOSD of all serostatus in a Latin American cohort that included non-Caucasian populations. Addition of STM to MC did not raise the accuracy significantly.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAquaporin 4ArgentinaAutoantibodiesBrainBrazilDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisNeuromyelitis OpticaPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySingle-Blind MethodSpinal CordVenezuelaYoung Adult