Journal of glaucoma · 2009
Trabeculectomy in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chen Yi-Hao, Lu Da-Wen, Cheng Jen-Hao, Chen Jiann-Torng, Chen Ching-Long
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To analyze the results of trabeculectomy in patients with primary angle-closure glaucoma.
METHODS: A retrospective and noncomparative case series analysis was performed on data from Taiwan, from 2001 to 2004. The outcomes of trabeculectomy in eyes with acute primary angle-closure glaucoma attack (AACG) and those with chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) were assessed in terms of final intraocular pressure (IOP), changes to visual acuity, and the incidence of complications.
RESULTS: A total of 52 eyes of 52 patients, 15 patients in AACG group and 37 patients in CACG group, were reviewed. The mean follow-up period was 32 months (range, 26-42 mo). In terms of no visual acuity change after surgery, there were significant differences between the CACG and AACG groups (P=0.02, Fisher exact test). In terms of final IOP control, trabeculectomy outcome was significantly worse in patients in the AACG group than those in the CACG group (P<0.01, Fisher exact test). Moreover, the complication of bleb encapsulation appeared more frequently in the AACG group than in the CACG group (P=0.02, Fisher exact test).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CACG, trabeculectomy may not be as good for patients of AACG, because it may lead to worsened visual acuity; it also seems to present a greater failure rate, more complications, and fewer cases of surgical survival.
METHODS: A retrospective and noncomparative case series analysis was performed on data from Taiwan, from 2001 to 2004. The outcomes of trabeculectomy in eyes with acute primary angle-closure glaucoma attack (AACG) and those with chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) were assessed in terms of final intraocular pressure (IOP), changes to visual acuity, and the incidence of complications.
RESULTS: A total of 52 eyes of 52 patients, 15 patients in AACG group and 37 patients in CACG group, were reviewed. The mean follow-up period was 32 months (range, 26-42 mo). In terms of no visual acuity change after surgery, there were significant differences between the CACG and AACG groups (P=0.02, Fisher exact test). In terms of final IOP control, trabeculectomy outcome was significantly worse in patients in the AACG group than those in the CACG group (P<0.01, Fisher exact test). Moreover, the complication of bleb encapsulation appeared more frequently in the AACG group than in the CACG group (P=0.02, Fisher exact test).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CACG, trabeculectomy may not be as good for patients of AACG, because it may lead to worsened visual acuity; it also seems to present a greater failure rate, more complications, and fewer cases of surgical survival.