Evidence for different types of water participation in the solvolysis of 1-adamantyl, tert-butyl, and methyl chlorides from density functional theory computations.

[structure: see text] The activation energy in the gas phase (deltaE(double dagger)) and the free energy of activation (deltaG(double dagger)) in water solution for the hydrolysis of the monohydrates of methyl chloride (MeCl), tert-butyl chloride (t-BuCl), and 1-adamantyl chloride (AdCl) have been computed with the B3LYP/631-G(d) method and the polarizable continuum (PCM) solvation model. There is a fair agreement between the deltaG(double dagger) values computed by us and the experimental data. The mechanistic implications of our computations are in severe contradiction with conventional representations. Thus, the computed nucleophilic solvent assistance (NSA) for the backside attack of a water molecule in the hydrolysis of MeCl is slightly lower than the corresponding NSA for t-BuCl. Hence, the hydrolysis of both MeCl and t-BuCl takes place mainly according to the classical S(N)2 mechanism. The most relevant difference is that deltaG(double dagger) for the frontside attack of water to t-BuCl is disfavored only by ca. 2 kcal/mol with regard to the backside attack but by ca. 23 kcal/mol in the case of MeCl. The higher solvolysis rate in water of t-BuCl in relation to AdCl is not due to steric factors affecting the specific solvation of the corresponding transition states, but to differential bulk solvent effects, which are accounted for by the PCM model.