DOI 10.1007/s10096-025-05314-2
Temporal changes in fungal epidemiology in ICU post-operative peritonitis cases.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Recent changes in the mycological profile have been reported in several life-threatening infections, but no data have assessed this issue in postoperative peritonitis (POP).
METHODS
This retrospective monocentric analysis (1999-2019) evaluated the temporal changes of fungi collected from POP samples in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and assessed the adequacy of antifungal therapy (AFT) and the prognosis.
RESULTS
Overall, 1,389 microorganisms were cultured from surgical samples in 464 ICU patients, including 186 (40%) patients harbouring fungi (11 fungaemia). Growing proportions of fungi were observed over time (p < 0.01), related to increased rates of Candida albicans and C. non-albicans (p = 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). A significantly increased prescription of empirical AFT was observed during the study period (p < 0.0001). Adequate empirical AFT was achieved in 93/186 (50%) patients in the fungal group. Documented AFT was given in 163/174 (94%) patients in the fungal group for a median duration of 14 [9-21] days, mainly with fluconazole. The ICU and hospital mortality rates were similar in bacterial and fungal groups. However, we observed a significant increase in the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay in the fungal group.
CONCLUSION
We observed high and growing proportions of fungi in patients treated for POP associated to increasing proportions of both C. albicans and C. non-albicans. Adequate AFT was achieved in all cases with caspofungin, but fluconazole remains an acceptable option for de-escalation. Our data suggest that, in ICU patients with POP, the severity of illness, rather than adequate AFT, drives clinical outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.