[Exploration of the origin of supra-aortic arterial trunk: can MR angiography with gadolinium injection replace digital angiography?].

Ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels are frequently associated with carotid stenosis. Consequently, exploration of the aortic arch is necessary prior to carotid endarterectomy. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (gRMA) could replace digital substraction angiography (DSA). The goal of this work was to evaluate gRMA for the detection of ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels. Twenty two patients with carotid stenosis > 50% on sonography examination prospectively underwent gRMA and DSA. We analyzed the overall quality of each gRMA and the degree of ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels (innominate, left carotid, subclavian and vertebral arteries). Thirteen gRMA examination was considered as good quality and 8 as adequate for diagnosis. There was significant correlation between gRMA and DSA for degree of stenosis (k = 0.82, p < 0.0001). gRMA tends to overestimate degree of ostial stenosis, especially for vertebral arteries. We conclude that gRMA is a promising tool but cannot yet be used as a stand-alone procedure for the evaluation of ostial stenosis of the craniocervical vessels.