m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025

Visual Cognitive Assessment Test correlates with brain amyloid status in Alzheimer's disease-related mild cognitive impairment.

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Su Feng-Juan, Li Yu-Cheng, Shi Xin-Chong, Yi Chang, Leow Yi Jin, Tanoto Pricilia, Lin Li-Shan, Chen Wei-Neng, Zhou Jia-Yi, Kong Hai-Fan, Wang Ya-Ting, Zhang Ya, Huang Yue-You, Kandiah Nagaendran, Zhang Xiang-Song, Zheng Yi-Fan, Pei Zhong

Аннотация

BackgroundAssessing amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is critical for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) intervention. The Visual Cognitive Assessment Test (VCAT), a language-neutral visual-based tool, effectively identifies MCI, but its correlation with Aβ pathology remains unverified.ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the ability of VCAT to distinguish between amyloid-positive (Aβ+) and amyloid-negative (Aβ-) people with different cognitive status and compare its performance with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).MethodsIn this cross-sectional analysis conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 139 cognitively normal (CN) individuals and 231 patients with MCI were enrolled. Participants underwent baseline data registration, VCAT, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating, amyloid PET assessments, and MRI scans. The main outcome measures considered the ability of the VCAT to distinguish between amyloid-positive and amyloid-negative MCI patients, as indicated by the area under the curve (AUC) values.ResultsVCAT and MoCA showed comparable efficacy in differentiating MCI from CN. For Aβ deposition discrimination, VCAT showed numerically higher accuracy than MoCA for detecting Aβ+ MCI (AUC 0.830 versus 0.797; sensitivity 72.7% versus 66.7%). VCAT's discriminative ability relied on memory and executive function domains. Shortened VCAT versions demonstrated reduced efficacy compared to the full VCAT.ConclusionsVCAT correlates well with PET-detected Aβ deposition and shows marginally superior performance to MoCA in identifying Aβ+ MCI. However, abbreviated VCAT versions are less effective for Aβ detection in MCI, highlighting the need for full-test administration in clinical practice.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

ИП Урсолов Владлен Сергеевич

ИНН 500118482352 · ОГРНИП 314500117700049

Реквизиты и контакты