Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 1997
Validity and reliability of the MTI photoscreener.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hatch S, Tibbles C D, Mestito I R, Read R, Traveis L, Richman J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The prevalence and necessity for early detection of vision problems illustrate the need for improved methods of vision screening in preschool children. This study assessed the validity and reliability of a new device, the MTI photoscreener in a cross-sectional field study.
METHODS: An appropriate sample size (> 140) was calculated and recruited for the study. All children (N = 161) in a migrant workers summer education program were screened with the MTI Photoscreener. Simultaneously and in a masked design, disease status was determined by the Modified Clinic Technique, a well established method for diagnosing the conditions which the MTI screener was designed to detect.
RESULTS: Validity measures revealed a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 87%, phi coefficient of 0.40, and positive predictive value of 52%. Repeatability was assessed by the kappa coefficient, by a test for effect modification by examiner, and by comparison of sensitivity and specificity across 12 masked examiners. The kappa coefficient was 0.38. A test for effect modification suggested that differences existed among the examiners. Variability of sensitivity was high, but variability of specificity was low.
CONCLUSIONS: Methods for vision screening in preschool children are limited. The MTI Photoscreener is an easy and efficient method, but the validity and reliability is a concern. Comparison of our results with other studies suggests future potential for this instrument provided protocols are refined and further field studies reveal efficacy.
METHODS: An appropriate sample size (> 140) was calculated and recruited for the study. All children (N = 161) in a migrant workers summer education program were screened with the MTI Photoscreener. Simultaneously and in a masked design, disease status was determined by the Modified Clinic Technique, a well established method for diagnosing the conditions which the MTI screener was designed to detect.
RESULTS: Validity measures revealed a sensitivity of 54%, specificity of 87%, phi coefficient of 0.40, and positive predictive value of 52%. Repeatability was assessed by the kappa coefficient, by a test for effect modification by examiner, and by comparison of sensitivity and specificity across 12 masked examiners. The kappa coefficient was 0.38. A test for effect modification suggested that differences existed among the examiners. Variability of sensitivity was high, but variability of specificity was low.
CONCLUSIONS: Methods for vision screening in preschool children are limited. The MTI Photoscreener is an easy and efficient method, but the validity and reliability is a concern. Comparison of our results with other studies suggests future potential for this instrument provided protocols are refined and further field studies reveal efficacy.