American journal of surgery · 2016
Outcomes of early ileocolectomy after percutaneous drainage for perforated ileocolic Crohn's disease.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sangster William, Berg Arthur S, Choi Christine S, Connelly Tara M, Chesnut Charles H, Koltun Walter A, Stewart David B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for an intra-abdominal abscess/infection secondary to perforating ileocolic Crohn's disease (PCD) is unclear.
METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive PCD patients treated via an institutional protocol of ileocolectomy after a 7-day period of percutaneous abscess drainage were retrospectively compared with 160 consecutive patients who underwent an elective ileocolectomy for Crohn's disease (ECD) between 1992 and 2014. Outcomes were compared using univariate analysis and propensity score matching.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences in ileostomy rates (PCD: 48.9% vs ECD: 18.8%; P = .001), 30-day readmissions (PCD: 38.3% vs ECD: 18.8%; P = .01), and overall 30-day postoperative complications (PCD: 29.8% vs ECD: 15%; P = .03). After matching, a statistically significant difference was retained in ileostomy rates (P = .02) and 30-day readmissions (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Early operative intervention after percutaneous drainage in perforating CD may be associated with a high incidence of diversions and readmissions.
METHODS: Forty-seven consecutive PCD patients treated via an institutional protocol of ileocolectomy after a 7-day period of percutaneous abscess drainage were retrospectively compared with 160 consecutive patients who underwent an elective ileocolectomy for Crohn's disease (ECD) between 1992 and 2014. Outcomes were compared using univariate analysis and propensity score matching.
RESULTS: Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences in ileostomy rates (PCD: 48.9% vs ECD: 18.8%; P = .001), 30-day readmissions (PCD: 38.3% vs ECD: 18.8%; P = .01), and overall 30-day postoperative complications (PCD: 29.8% vs ECD: 15%; P = .03). After matching, a statistically significant difference was retained in ileostomy rates (P = .02) and 30-day readmissions (P = .01).
CONCLUSIONS: Early operative intervention after percutaneous drainage in perforating CD may be associated with a high incidence of diversions and readmissions.