Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2006
Evaluation of a rapid automated assay for analysis of von Willebrand ristocetin cofactor activity.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Strandberg Karin, Lethagen Stefan, Andersson Kerstin, Carlson Margareta, Hillarp Andreas
Аннотация
A commercially available turbidometric assay has been evaluated for the measurement of von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor activity (VWF:RCo). The assay is simple, rapid, and can be cost-effectively performed on automated coagulation analyzers. This study's aim is to illustrate the performance of the automated VWF:RCo assay and its capacity to identify patients with von Willebrand disease (VWD). By direct comparison with a conventional VWF:RCo assay, performed on an aggregometer, the concordance between the two assays was 96%. With minor modifications, the automated assay showed a detection level of 0.03 kIU/L with linearity to 2.00 kIU/L. The imprecision of the automated assay was reduced compared to the conventional assay procedure with CV of 6.8% at the 1.00 kIU/L level and 8.6% at the 0.30 kIU/L level. The automated VWF:RCo assay was also suitable as a screening test to detect VWD in patients investigated for the cause of an increased bleeding tendency. In this situation the automated VWF:RCo assay was tested simultaneously with an automated immunoassay for von Willebrand antigen. Receiver operating curves for the diagnosis of VWD showed a greater area under the curve for the automated VWF:RCo assay compared to the immunoassay, 0.98 vs. 0.94, although the difference did not reach significance. In conclusion, the modified automated VWF:RCo assay shows better precision, lower detection limit, is faster to perform with a lower cost per test compared to the conventional aggregometer based VWF:RCo activity method and is an alternative to an antigen immunoassay as a screening test for VWD.