MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3109/15569527.2013.816723

Медицинская библиотека · Cutaneous and ocular toxicology · 2013

Irritant nail dermatitis of chemical depilatory product presenting with koilonychia.

Pancar Gunseli Sefika, Kalkan Goknur

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Chemical hair removal products are available as creams, gels, powders, aerosols and roll-ons and all of these forms work in the same way by breaking chemical bonds between sulfur atoms in the protein. Currently, the common active ingredients of these products are calcium thioglycolate, potassium thioglycolate, arsenic and sulfur minerals. Sulfur and arsenic containing products are important toxic chemicals which are mainly used for removing hair in developing countries. Irritant contact dermatitis accounts for 80% of all contact dermatitis reactions which are often occupation-related. Toluene sulfonamide, formaldehyde resin, acrylates and ethylcyanoacrylate are the most common irritants. Irritant nail dermatitis with plants has been well defined with Lobelia richardii flower, Compositae family and garlic. Although allergic dermatitis, irritant dermatitis and irritant nail dermatitis have been well demonstrated with chemicals, koilonychia is unusual presentation of irritant dermatitis. Here we describe a case of nail irritant dermatitis due to application of chemical depilatory product for hair removal presented with koilonychias. To our knowledge this is the first case of such presentation with koilonychia in the English literature.

Для цитирования: Pancar Gunseli Sefika, Kalkan Goknur. Irritant nail dermatitis of chemical depilatory product presenting with koilonychia.. Cutaneous and ocular toxicology. 2013. DOI: 10.3109/15569527.2013.816723.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.