MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s12325-024-03032-3

Медицинская библиотека · Advances in therapy · 2024

Efanesoctocog Alfa versus Standard and Extended Half-Life Factor VIII Prophylaxis in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Haemophilia A without Inhibitors.

Klamroth Robert, Kragh Nana, Arnaud Alix, Guyot Patricia, Wilson Amanda, Wojciechowski Piotr, Wdowiak Marlena, Margas Wojciech, Bystrická Linda, Tosetto Alberto

СтатьяСистематический обзорСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

In the Phase 3 XTEND-1 trial, (NCT04161495) efanesoctocog alfa prophylaxis provided superior bleed protection versus pre-study factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy in patients with severe haemophilia A. The aim of this study was to indirectly compare bleed outcomes between efanesoctocog alfa and standard/extended half-life (SHL and EHL) FVIII replacement therapies in adolescent and adult patients with severe haemophilia A without inhibitors.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify Phase 3 trials of EHL and SHL FVIII replacement therapies for comparison with efanesoctocog alfa data from XTEND-1. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons were used to compare annualised bleeding rates (ABRs) for any, treated, joint, and spontaneous bleeds between efanesoctocog alfa and comparators. The estimates from respective comparisons were pooled using random-effect meta-analyses to evaluate the overall difference between efanesoctocog alfa and comparator therapies.

RESULTS

Four EHL therapies (rurioctocog alfa pegol, efmoroctocog alfa, turoctocog alfa pegol, damoctocog alfa pegol) and two octocog alfa SHL therapies were included. In meta-analyses, efanesoctocog alfa was associated with significantly lower ABRs for any [mean difference (95% CI) - 2.24 ( - 3.24; - 1.25)], spontaneous [ - 1.52 ( - 2.33; - 0.72)], and joint bleeds [ - 1.60 ( - 2.32; - 0.88)] versus EHL therapies, and with significantly lower ABRs for any [ - 3.61 ( - 4.43; - 2.79)], treated [ - 1.55 ( - 1.89; - 1.20)], spontaneous [ - 2.52 ( - 3.31; - 1.72)], and joint bleeds [ - 3.42 ( - 4.77; - 2.08)] versus SHL therapies.

CONCLUSION

Efanesoctocog alfa was associated with significantly lower ABRs (any, spontaneous and joint) compared with EHL or SHL prophylaxis therapies. Patients had, on average, 2.2 and 3.6 fewer bleeds per year versus EHL and SHL therapies, respectively.

Для цитирования: Klamroth Robert, Kragh Nana, Arnaud Alix, Guyot Patricia, Wilson Amanda, Wojciechowski Piotr, Wdowiak Marlena, Margas Wojciech, Bystrická Linda, Tosetto Alberto. Efanesoctocog Alfa versus Standard and Extended Half-Life Factor VIII Prophylaxis in Adolescent and Adult Patients with Haemophilia A without Inhibitors.. Advances in therapy. 2024. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-03032-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.