MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/der.0000000000000105

Медицинская библиотека · Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug · 2015

Methylchloroisothiazolinone/Methylisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone allergy.

Puangpet Pailin, Chawarung Apawalee, McFadden John P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Preservatives used in cosmetics tend to be, by their nature, allergenic. Methylisothiazolinone (MI) has been used as a sole preservative in multiple cosmetics, household goods, and toiletries. A current epidemic of MI has recently been reported in Europe.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to study the prevalence of methylchloroisothiazolinone/MI (MCI/MI) and MI allergy in a Bangkok dermatology clinic.

METHODS

During January 2009 to June 2014, 3253 consecutive patients tested with 100 ppm (0.01%) MCI/MI and patients tested with 2000 ppm (0.2%) MI were included in the study.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty of 3253 patients (9.8%) tested for MCI/MI had a positive reaction. There was a steep increase in the prevalence of MCI/MI contact allergy from 4.8% in 2009 to 11.2% in 2011 and 17% in 2013. In the first 6 months of 2014, 22 of 54 cases tested for MI (40.7%) had a positive reaction. Among those who had a positive reaction to MI, 6 of 22 (27.3%) showed negative reaction to MCI/MI.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a similar prevalence of MI allergy in a Bangkok dermatology clinic as those reported in European centers such in the United Kingdom.

Для цитирования: Puangpet Pailin, Chawarung Apawalee, McFadden John P. Methylchloroisothiazolinone/Methylisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone allergy.. Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug. 2015. DOI: 10.1097/der.0000000000000105.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.