Sleep medicine · 2023
Evaluation of consensus sleep stage scoring of dysregulated sleep in Parkinson's disease.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
West Leslie C, Summers Michael, Tang Siqun, Hirt Lisa, Halpern Casey H, Maroni Dulce, Das Rig, Gliske Stephen V, Abosch Aviva, Kushida Clete A, Thompson John A
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Sleep dysregulation in Parkinson's disease (PD) has been hypothesized to occur, in part, from dysfunction in the basal ganglia-cortical circuit. Assessment of this relationship requires accurate sleep stage determination, a known challenge in this clinical population. Our objective was to optimize the consensus on the sleep staging process and reduce interrater variability in a cohort of advanced PD subjects.
METHODS: Fifteen PD subjects were enrolled from three sites in a clinical trial that involved recordings from subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads (NCT04620551). Video polysomnography (vPSG) data for a total of 45 nights were analyzed. Four experienced scorers independently scored data on initial review. Epochs with less than 75% consensus were flagged for secondary review. In secondary review of discordant epochs, two of the original scorers re-assessed epochs, from which the final consensus stage was derived.
RESULTS: Sleep stage classification agreement averaged 83.10% across all sleep stages on initial scoring (IS), and on secondary consensus scoring (CS) review, agreement reached 96.58%. Greatest disagreement was noted in determination of awake epochs (33.6% of discordant epochs) and non-rapid-eye-movement stage 2 (N2) epochs (31.8% of discordant epochs). Scoring discrepancy was resolved with direct measurement of cortical frequency and amplitudes, physiologic context of the epoch, and video review.
CONCLUSION: Our method of multi-level initial and then secondary consensus review scoring resulted in consensus scoring agreement superior to conventional standards. This work features a custom-engineered vPSG software and review platform for integration of consensus sleep stage scoring in a multi-site clinical trial.
METHODS: Fifteen PD subjects were enrolled from three sites in a clinical trial that involved recordings from subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads (NCT04620551). Video polysomnography (vPSG) data for a total of 45 nights were analyzed. Four experienced scorers independently scored data on initial review. Epochs with less than 75% consensus were flagged for secondary review. In secondary review of discordant epochs, two of the original scorers re-assessed epochs, from which the final consensus stage was derived.
RESULTS: Sleep stage classification agreement averaged 83.10% across all sleep stages on initial scoring (IS), and on secondary consensus scoring (CS) review, agreement reached 96.58%. Greatest disagreement was noted in determination of awake epochs (33.6% of discordant epochs) and non-rapid-eye-movement stage 2 (N2) epochs (31.8% of discordant epochs). Scoring discrepancy was resolved with direct measurement of cortical frequency and amplitudes, physiologic context of the epoch, and video review.
CONCLUSION: Our method of multi-level initial and then secondary consensus review scoring resulted in consensus scoring agreement superior to conventional standards. This work features a custom-engineered vPSG software and review platform for integration of consensus sleep stage scoring in a multi-site clinical trial.