DOI 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00342-1
Prevalence and underrecognition of dysthymia among psychiatric outpatients in São Paulo, Brazil.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Dysthymia is a highly prevalent disorder with rates varying from 3 to 6%. It is estimated that 7% of primary care and up to 36% of the psychiatric outpatients have this disorder. Dysthymia is characterized by a pattern of low intensity and long duration depression, leading to impairment in many aspects of the patient's life (work, family). However, it is a condition which is not frequently diagnosed, thereby remaining untreated and leading to chronification, risk of developing depression and substance abuse. Despite the well-known fact that dysthymia is underdiagnosed, there are no studies in Brazil regarding this problem. This paper presents a study on the prevalence of dysthymia in an outpatient psychiatric population in São Paulo, Brazil, identifying factors associated with the underdiagnosis of dysthymia.
METHODS
Two raters carried out a study of 81 patients from a university outpatient clinic in São Paulo, using the SCID-I/P. The kappa coefficient was used to measure the inter-rater reliability for the dysthymia diagnosis. The SCID-I/P diagnosis was compared to consulting psychiatrist's diagnosis. Factors associated with underdiagnosis were identified.
RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS
27% of the sample had SCID dysthymia. They presented more comorbidities than non-dysthymics. Only 27% of these SCID dysthymics were considered 'pure' dysthymics. Clinicians had identified only 37% of these SCID diagnosed cases as dysthymic. The main reason for missing diagnosis of dysthymia in this sample was axis I comorbidity.
LIMITATION: As we did not investigate the presence of personality disorder, the impact of axis II on misdiagnosis of dysthymia could not be investigated in our sample.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.