MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb139081.x

Медицинская библиотека · The Medical journal of Australia · 1998

Prevalence of Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome in Australia: has thiamine fortification made a difference?

Harper C G, Sheedy D L, Lara A I, Garrick T M, Hilton J M, Raisanen J

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of the Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome (WKS) in Australia and compare this with previous studies.

DESIGN AND

SETTING

Prospective autopsy study at the New South Wales Institute of Forensic Medicine, 1996-1997.

METHODS

Brains of deceased people (aged over 15 years) derived from 2212 sequential autopsies performed between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 1997 were studied macroscopically and microscopically to identify cases of WKS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Standard histological criteria for WKS and any available clinical data.

RESULTS

Twenty-five cases of WKS were identified (prevalence, 1.1%), mostly among the 5.9% of the 2212 people who had a history suggestive of alcohol abuse. Only four cases (16%) had been diagnosed during life.

CONCLUSIONS

There has been a significant reduction in the prevalence of WKS in Australia since the introduction of thiamine enrichment of bread flour. While the prevalence is still higher than in most other Western countries, further research is needed before adding thiamine to alcoholic beverages can be recommended.

Для цитирования: Harper C G, Sheedy D L, Lara A I, Garrick T M, Hilton J M, Raisanen J. Prevalence of Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome in Australia: has thiamine fortification made a difference?. The Medical journal of Australia. 1998. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1998.tb139081.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.