MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0004-282x2013005000001

Медицинская библиотека · Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2013

Is the population properly informed about sleep disorders?

Camargo Eleida Pereira, Carvalho Luciane Bizari Coin, Prado Lucila Bizari Fernandes, Prado Gilmar Fernandes

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To measure the prior knowledge about sleep disorders and patient's ability to report their problems adequately to health professionals.

METHODS

We analyzed 208 patient's records and extracted the following information: date of birth, gender, medical diagnostic hypotheses, patient's primary complaint in their words, considering the most appropriated semantic approximation to the perceptual phenomena, either by their own or by reasoning information from the partner. We compared the agreement (Kappa's test) between patient's complaint and medical diagnosis. The 95% confidence interval was used to analyze proportions.

RESULTS

We found strong correlations for bruxism; moderate for snoring, insomnia, nightmares, somniloquy, and restless legs syndrome; fair for excessive movement during sleep (EMDS) and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA).

CONCLUSIONS

The observed correlations were heterogeneous, but important diseases such as OSA and EMDS in children showed fair and weak correlations. This suggests an unsatisfactory knowledge level among the population about these disorders, despite their high prevalence and impact on patient's overall health.

Для цитирования: Camargo Eleida Pereira, Carvalho Luciane Bizari Coin, Prado Lucila Bizari Fernandes, Prado Gilmar Fernandes. Is the population properly informed about sleep disorders?. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2013. DOI: 10.1590/s0004-282x2013005000001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.