MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1017/s0317167100001578

Медицинская библиотека · The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques · 2001

The role of MRI and nerve root biopsy in the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis.

Moore F G, Andermann F, Richardson J, Tampieri D, Giaccone R

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

Neurological involvement occurs in 5-15% of patients with sarcoidosis and isolated "neurosarcoidosis" occurs in less than 1% of all cases. Classical clinical presentations have been described, such as bilateral facial palsy, but often the disease presents insidiously with varied signs and symptoms. We present a patient who required biopsy of a lumbar nerve root for diagnosis of chronic, progressive neurosarcoidosis and review the literature with an emphasis on diagnosis.

METHODS

We have reviewed a patient who presented with signs and symptoms related to infiltration of her meninges and nerve roots by sarcoidosis. All pertinent history and physical information was taken from interviews with the patient and review of her chart. Laboratory, radiographic, and pathological investigations are presented.

RESULTS AND

CONCLUSIONS

A high index of suspicion is required for the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis. Gadolinium-enhanced MRI is useful but the findings are often nonspecific, and there should be a low threshold for biopsy whenever the diagnosis is considered.

Для цитирования: Moore F G, Andermann F, Richardson J, Tampieri D, Giaccone R. The role of MRI and nerve root biopsy in the diagnosis of neurosarcoidosis.. The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques. 2001. DOI: 10.1017/s0317167100001578.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.