MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530120057010

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of neurology · 1990

Tuberculous meningitis. Short course of chemotherapy.

Alarcón F, Escalante L, Pérez Y, Banda H, Chacón G, Dueñas G

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

In March 1986, we began a 6-month short course trial of therapy for tuberculous meningitis, in which 28 patients were analyzed. The diagnosis was based on the following cerebrospinal fluid test results: in 53.5% of the cases, Mycobacterium tuberculosis was identified by direct smear; in 57%, culture in Löwenstein-Jensen medium was positive; in 83.3%, the detection of anti-bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was positive; and in 74%, the dosification of adenosine deaminase activity was positive. In addition, in 21.4% of the cases, the diagnosis was established by means of autopsy findings. Moreover, the diagnosis was supported by bacteriological analyses from another tissue or body fluids. Despite the administration of an antituberculous therapy, 32.4% of the patients died: all of the decreased had reached the last stage of the disease by the beginning of treatment. Sixteen percent of the patients who survived after more than 18 months of follow-up after therapy had ended suffered neurological sequelae. With the 6-month therapeutic regimen, the morbidity/mortality is similar to that found in the longer-course therapies. The latter regimen is therefore thought to be a good and acceptable therapeutic option for the treatment of tuberculous meningitis.

Для цитирования: Alarcón F, Escalante L, Pérez Y, Banda H, Chacón G, Dueñas G. Tuberculous meningitis. Short course of chemotherapy.. Archives of neurology. 1990. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530120057010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.