Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2000
Foldable silicone versus poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses in combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Braga-Mele R, Cohen S, Rootman D S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the outcome of phacotrabeculectomy with implantation of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) or foldable silicone intraocular lenses (IOLs).
METHODS: Thirty patients were randomized to receive a 5.5 mm PMMA IOL through a 5.0 mm incision or a foldable silicone IOL (Allergan SI-30) through a 3.2 mm incision. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), bleb survival, inflammation, endothelial cell changes, and complications were examined at intervals up to 6 months.
RESULTS: There was no difference between the 2 groups in final visual outcome, final IOP control, bleb survival, and endothelial cell changes. Two months after surgery, there was significantly more inflammation in the silicone IOL group than in the PMMA group (P <. 05). The silicone group had a significantly higher combined complication rate including iris capture, choroidal effusion, and epiretinal membrane formation (P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Foldable silicone IOLs were comparable to conventional PMMA lenses in visual outcome, IOP control, bleb formation, and endothelial changes. However, some silicone lenses are associated with an increased risk of recurrence of inflammation and a higher final complication rate in combined cataract and filtration surgery.
METHODS: Thirty patients were randomized to receive a 5.5 mm PMMA IOL through a 5.0 mm incision or a foldable silicone IOL (Allergan SI-30) through a 3.2 mm incision. Visual acuity, intraocular pressure (IOP), bleb survival, inflammation, endothelial cell changes, and complications were examined at intervals up to 6 months.
RESULTS: There was no difference between the 2 groups in final visual outcome, final IOP control, bleb survival, and endothelial cell changes. Two months after surgery, there was significantly more inflammation in the silicone IOL group than in the PMMA group (P <. 05). The silicone group had a significantly higher combined complication rate including iris capture, choroidal effusion, and epiretinal membrane formation (P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Foldable silicone IOLs were comparable to conventional PMMA lenses in visual outcome, IOP control, bleb formation, and endothelial changes. However, some silicone lenses are associated with an increased risk of recurrence of inflammation and a higher final complication rate in combined cataract and filtration surgery.