MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3855/jidc.2442

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of infection in developing countries · 2013

Distribution of Candida species among HIV-positive patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis in Accra, Ghana.

Kwamin Francis, Nartey Nii Otu, Codjoe Francis S, Newman Mercy J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Oropharyngeal candidiasis is a common occurrence in the course of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease progression. Changes in the clinical severity of oropharyngeal candidiasis and type of Candida species profile may be a reflection of immunological changes in patients. The aim of this study was to undertake a baseline Candida species identification for future reference.

METHODOLOGY: Oral swabs of 267 HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis were cultured and Candida species were identified by API 32 C.

RESULTS

A total of 201 (75.3%) Candida species and 10 (3.7%) non candida fungi were identified. Twenty different Candida species were isolated. Candida albicans was the most prevalent species (68.5%) followed by C. tropicalis (7.4%), C. krusei (6.4%), C. parapsilosis (3.0%) and C. sake (2.5%). Other species ranged from 0.5% to 1.5%. Positive culture was independent of whether patients were on anti-retroviral therapy or not.

CONCLUSION

Of all Candida isolates, 68.5% were identified as C. albicans. Since other uncommon species were also isolated, it may be necessary in this group of patients to identify Candida species causing severe infections.

Для цитирования: Kwamin Francis, Nartey Nii Otu, Codjoe Francis S, Newman Mercy J. Distribution of Candida species among HIV-positive patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis in Accra, Ghana.. Journal of infection in developing countries. 2013. DOI: 10.3855/jidc.2442.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.