Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2022
Longitudinal evaluations of somatosensory-motor inhibition in Dopa-responsive dystonia.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weissbach Anne, Steinmeier Annika, Pauly Martje, Al-Shorafat Duha M, Saranza Gerard, Lang Anthony, Brüggemann Norbert, Tadic Vera, Klein Christine, Münchau Alexander, Bäumer Tobias, Brown Matt J N
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: GCH1 mutations have been linked to decreased striatal dopamine and development of dopa-responsive dystonia (DRD) and Parkinsonism. Sensory and sensorimotor integration impairments have been documented in various forms of dystonia. DRD patients with confirmed GCH1 mutations have demonstrated normal short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI), a measure of sensorimotor inhibition, under chronic dopaminergic replacement therapy (DRT), but reduced inhibition after a single l-dopa dose following 24 h withdrawal. Studies have revealed normal SAI in other forms of dystonia but reductions with DRT in Parkinson's disease. Longitudinal changes in sensorimotor inhibition are unknown.
METHODS: We analyzed sensorimotor inhibition using two different measures: SAI and somatosensory-motor inhibition using dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (ds-TMS). SAI was measured using digit stimulation 25 ms prior to contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) TMS. DS-TMS was measured using TMS over the somatosensory cortex 1 or 2.5 ms prior to ipsilateral M1 stimulation. A total of 20 GCH1 mutation carriers and 20 age-matched controls were included in the study. SAI and ds-TMS were evaluated in GCH1 mutation carriers both OFF and ON DRT compared to controls. Furthermore, longitudinal changes of SAI were examined in a subset of the same individuals that were measured ∼five years earlier.
RESULTS: Neither SAI nor ds-TMS were significantly different in GCH1 mutation carriers relative to controls. No effects of DRT on SAI or ds-TMS were seen but SAI decreased over time in mutation carriers OFF DRT.
CONCLUSION: Our longitudinal results suggest changes in SAI that could be associated with plasticity changes in sensorimotor networks.
METHODS: We analyzed sensorimotor inhibition using two different measures: SAI and somatosensory-motor inhibition using dual-site transcranial magnetic stimulation (ds-TMS). SAI was measured using digit stimulation 25 ms prior to contralateral primary motor cortex (M1) TMS. DS-TMS was measured using TMS over the somatosensory cortex 1 or 2.5 ms prior to ipsilateral M1 stimulation. A total of 20 GCH1 mutation carriers and 20 age-matched controls were included in the study. SAI and ds-TMS were evaluated in GCH1 mutation carriers both OFF and ON DRT compared to controls. Furthermore, longitudinal changes of SAI were examined in a subset of the same individuals that were measured ∼five years earlier.
RESULTS: Neither SAI nor ds-TMS were significantly different in GCH1 mutation carriers relative to controls. No effects of DRT on SAI or ds-TMS were seen but SAI decreased over time in mutation carriers OFF DRT.
CONCLUSION: Our longitudinal results suggest changes in SAI that could be associated with plasticity changes in sensorimotor networks.