MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Turkish neurosurgery · 2008

Review of a series with abducens nerve palsy.

Ayberk Giyas, Ozveren Mehmet Faik, Yildirim Timur, Ercan Karabekir, Cay Emine Kalkan, Koçak Ayşegül

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

In this report, we aimed to investigate the patients that presented at our clinic complaint with diplopia due to the abducens nerve palsy and neurosurgical disease.

METHODS

The study design was a retrospective review of ten cases with the abducens nerve palsy. The causes of the abducens nerve paralysis of our patients were as follows: two cases with head trauma, three cases with pituitary tumors, one case with sphenoid sinus mucocele, one case with greater superficial petrosal nerve cellular schwannoma at the petrous apex, one case with hypertensive intraventricular hemmorhage, one case with hydrocephalus, and one case with parotid tumor and skull base/brain stem invasion.

RESULTS

Depending on the location of the lesion, the symptoms due to nuclear damage showed no improvement as in our case with adenocarcinoma of the parotid gland. The lesions sited at the subarachnoid portion of the abducens nerve or in the cavernous sinus, the abducens nerve palsy improved or botilinum injection was performed during recovery period.

CONCLUSION

We presented abducens nerve palsy cases due to neruosurgical disorders. A botilinum injection was performed in three patients with the abducens palsy. Botilinum injection can help patients with sixth nerve palsy during the recovery period.

Для цитирования: Ayberk Giyas, Ozveren Mehmet Faik, Yildirim Timur, Ercan Karabekir, Cay Emine Kalkan, Koçak Ayşegül. Review of a series with abducens nerve palsy.. Turkish neurosurgery. 2008.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.