MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.115

Медицинская библиотека · World neurosurgery · 2017

Candida Meningitis After Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Single-Institution Case Series and Literature Review.

Bridges Kelly J, Li Ryan, Fleseriu Maria, Cetas Justin S

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Candida meningitis after neurosurgical procedures is a rare but potentially devastating complication. The presentation of meningitis can be insidious in immunosuppressed patients and thus can be easily overlooked. Cerebrospinal fluid studies often resemble bacterial profiles, and cultures can be falsely negative. Candida albicans is the most common species identified in postsurgical Candida meningitis, and delay in diagnosis and treatment can be devastating. The standard induction therapy for Candida meningitis has been amphotericin B combined with flucytosine. A high index of suspicion is needed in any patient with risk factors such as abdominal surgery, bowel perforation, recent broad spectrum antibiotic therapy, intravenous drug use, extremes of age, indwelling catheters, and immunosuppression such as AIDS, malignancy, antineoplastic therapy, and steroid use. Here, we describe 3 case presentations of patients with giant skull base tumors who developed postsurgical Candida meningitis, each with vastly different clinical courses and outcomes, ranging from benign to catastrophic. We performed a literature review with special focus on common risk factors, Candida species, diagnostic criteria, and treatment.

Для цитирования: Bridges Kelly J, Li Ryan, Fleseriu Maria, Cetas Justin S. Candida Meningitis After Transsphenoidal Surgery: A Single-Institution Case Series and Literature Review.. World neurosurgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.115.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.