MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3290/j.ohpd.a32996

Медицинская библиотека · Oral health & preventive dentistry · 2015

Assessment of the Accuracy of Two Dental Screening Methods Used in a School Setting.

El Tantawi Maha M A, AbdelAziz Wafaa E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of two screening methods used by dentists in the Health Insurance Organisation in Alexandria, Egypt aiming at identifying children who need referral for treatment.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The study included 45 dentists who examined 30 children using exclusively visual screening (VS) and visual screening with tongue blade (VSTB). A benchmark dentist examined the same group of children using mirror and probe (MP). VS and VSTB were compared to MP. Sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were calculated. The effect of dentist's gender, year of graduation and having postgraduate studies on the accuracy of the two methods was assessed.

RESULTS

VS had greater accuracy than VSTB. Both methods had a Sn and Sp>82%. The PPV of both methods was >97%, whereas that of NPV was ≤44%. Males and recent graduates performed better than females and senior dentists when using VS and VSTB methods.

CONCLUSIONS

It is questionable whether screening using VS or VSTB can ensure effective referral of children for treatment. Further studies are needed to assess other aspects of screening, including whether referred children actually seek care and whether screening improves children's oral health.

Для цитирования: El Tantawi Maha M A, AbdelAziz Wafaa E. Assessment of the Accuracy of Two Dental Screening Methods Used in a School Setting.. Oral health & preventive dentistry. 2015. DOI: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a32996.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.