MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.rchipe.2015.12.003

Медицинская библиотека · Revista chilena de pediatria · 2016

[Venous angiomas and headache in children. A case report].

López Mauricio, Huete Isidro, Hernández Marta

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Venous angiomas (VA) are benign entities; however infrequent symptomatic cases may occur.

OBJECTIVE

Case report and literature review.

CASE REPORT: A 6 year old girl was referred with a history of bi-frontal, non-pulsatile, headache with no nausea or vomiting. Headache intensity was 4-6/10. The episodes were frequent, 3-4 times per week. Triggers include academic work. Computed tomography showed a small VA in left caudate nucleus, which was confirmed by a brain MRI, with no evidence of inflammatory or ischaemic changes, or another vascular malformation. Psychological and psycho-pedagogic techniques were used, combined with relaxation and cognitive-behavioural techniques to reduce the intensity and frequency. There was a good outcome, and the headache decreased to 10 episodes per year. The patient was monitored for 12 years until graduation from high school. The VA remained without complications.

CONCLUSIONS

In the study of a headache, a VA usually is an incidental finding. The International Classification of Headache Disorders III provides specific criteria of frequent episodic tension-type headache, and allows us begin specific therapy for it. Monitoring of non-symptomatic VA cases should be clinical. The surgical management of these entities is exceptional.

Для цитирования: López Mauricio, Huete Isidro, Hernández Marta. [Venous angiomas and headache in children. A case report].. Revista chilena de pediatria. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.rchipe.2015.12.003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.