MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1331/japha.2014.14032

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA · 2014

Pharmacy technician-to-pharmacist ratios: a state-driven safety and quality decision.

Bess D Todd, Carter Jason, DeLoach Lindsey, White Carol L

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the policy of pharmacy technician-to-pharmacist ratios by comparing Florida as an example of legislative-led authority versus Tennessee as an example of board of pharmacy-led ruling.

SUMMARY: Over the past 2 years, the Florida legislature has debated the issue of pharmacy staffing ratios, initially leaving the Florida Board of Pharmacy with little authority to advocate for and enact safe technician staffing ratios. Anticipating this situation, the Tennessee Board of Pharmacy created rules to meet pharmacy staffing needs while protecting the authority of the pharmacist-in-charge and promoting patient safety. Before enacting rules, members of the board toured the state and talked about proposed rule changes with pharmacists. The final rule sets the pharmacy technician-to-pharmacist ratio at 2:1 but permits a 4:1 ratio based on public safety considerations and availability of at least two Certified Pharmacy Technicians.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacists and leaders within the profession should conduct further research on appropriate and safe ratios of pharmacy technicians to pharmacists, with a focus on safety and quality of care.

Для цитирования: Bess D Todd, Carter Jason, DeLoach Lindsey, White Carol L. Pharmacy technician-to-pharmacist ratios: a state-driven safety and quality decision.. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association : JAPhA. 2014. DOI: 10.1331/japha.2014.14032.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.