MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/bf01046324

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 1992

Comparison of DSM-III-R and childhood autism rating scale diagnoses of autism.

Van Bourgondien M E, Marcus L M, Schopler E

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The purpose of this study was to clarify the issue of whether DSM-III-R (American Psychological Association [APA], 1987) over- or underdiagnoses autism by comparing this diagnostic system to a well-established objective measure of diagnosis, the Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS). A secondary goal was to determine which of the 16 criteria are the best discriminators of autism. DSM-III-R, CARS, and clinical diagnoses of 138 consecutive admissions to a statewide program for the diagnosis and treatment of autistic and related communication-handicapped individuals (Division TEACCH in North Carolina) were compared. Results indicated a generally high degree of agreement on the diagnosis of autism using the three systems. Within this treatment-oriented program, the CARS and clinical ratings diagnosed a greater number of cases as autistic than did the DSM-III-R criteria, suggesting that DSM-III-R slightly underdiagnosed autism. The criteria that most strongly related to the diagnosis of autism regardless of the system were lack of awareness of others, abnormal social play, an impaired ability to make friends, abnormal nonverbal communication, stereotypic body movements, and restricted range of interests.

Для цитирования: Van Bourgondien M E, Marcus L M, Schopler E. Comparison of DSM-III-R and childhood autism rating scale diagnoses of autism.. Journal of autism and developmental disorders. 1992. DOI: 10.1007/bf01046324.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.