MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jper.23-0573

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of periodontology · 2024

Peri-implantitis induction and resolution around zirconia versus titanium implants.

Esplin Kaleb C, Tsai Yi-Wen, Vela Kathryn, Diogenes Anibal, Hachem Lea El, Palaiologou Archontia, Cochran David L, Kotsakis Georgios A

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

This study compared titanium and zirconia implant ligature-induced peri-implant defect progression and response to regenerative surgical intervention.

METHODS

Eight tissue-level endosseous implants were placed in 6 mixed-breed foxhounds, with 2 zirconia and 2 titanium alternating in each hemimandible. Cotton ligatures were placed subgingivally for 16 weeks followed by 8 weeks of spontaneous progression. Standardized radiographs were captured every 2 weeks to evaluate the rate of bone loss. Regenerative surgery was performed utilizing water-jet decontamination, enamel matrix derivative, and locally harvested autogenous bone. After 16 weeks of healing, final radiographic bone levels as well as probing depths, recession, and clinical attachment levels were assessed.

RESULTS

All 48 implants integrated successfully. The final average post-ligature radiographic defects were 2.88 and 3.05 mm for titanium and zirconia implants, respectively. There was no significant difference between materials in the rate of radiographic bone loss (p = 0.09). Following regenerative surgery, the total average amount of radiographic bone gain was 1.41 and 1.20 mm for titanium and zirconia, respectively. The percentage of defect fill was 51.56% and 37.98% (p = 0.03) for titanium and zirconia, respectively. Inter-group differences were minimal for clinical parameters at the time of sacrifice including periodontal pocket depths (p = 0.81), recession (p = 0.98), or clinical attachment levels (p = 0.51).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant difference was found in the rate of peri-implant defect development between titanium and zirconia implants. Both materials gained significant radiographic bone following regenerative surgery with significantly greater defect percentage fill in titanium implants. The final clinical parameters were similar in both groups.

Для цитирования: Esplin Kaleb C, Tsai Yi-Wen, Vela Kathryn, Diogenes Anibal, Hachem Lea El, Palaiologou Archontia, Cochran David L, Kotsakis Georgios A. Peri-implantitis induction and resolution around zirconia versus titanium implants.. Journal of periodontology. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/jper.23-0573.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.