Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology · 2024
Comparative analysis of Ficoll-Hypaque and CytoLyt techniques for blood removal in breast cancer malignant effusions: effects on RNA quality and sequencing outcomes.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sura Gloria H, Tran Kevin, Trevarton Alexander J, Marczyk Michal, Fu Chunxiao, Du Lili, Qu Jiaxin, Lau Rosanna, Tasto Amy, Gould Rebekah E, Tinnirello Agata, Sinn Bruno V, Pusztai Lajos, Hatzis Christos, Symmans W Fraser
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: To optimize RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) outcomes, we investigated preanalytical variables in malignant effusions containing metastatic breast cancer. We compared 2 processing methods-Ficoll-Hypaque density gradient enrichment and CytoLyt hemolysis-focusing on their effects on RNA quality, transcript abundance, and variant detection from cytospin slides, relative to fresh-frozen samples. Additionally, we compared read-based and Unique Molecular Identifier (UMI)-based library preparation methods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen malignant effusion specimens from metastatic breast cancer were processed using both the Ficoll-Hypaque and Cytolyt methods. RNA was extracted from fresh-frozen samples stored in RNA preservative and from cytospin slides fixed in Carnoy's solution. RNA quality was evaluated using RNA integrity number (RIN) and the percentage of fragments >200 bases (DV200). Sequencing was conducted with both read- and UMI-based methods.
RESULTS: Purified RNA was more fragmented by the Cytolyt method (mean RIN: 3.56, DV200: 78.97%), compared to the Ficoll-Hypaque method (mean RIN: 6.29, DV200: 88.08%). Sequencing data had high concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for measurements of gene expression, whether from Cytolyt or Ficoll-Hypaque treated samples, and whether using the UMI- or read-based sequencing methods (read-based mean CCC: 0.967 from Cytolyt versus 0.974 from Ficoll-Hypaque, UMI-based mean CCC: 0.972 from Cytolyt versus 0.977 from Ficoll-Hypaque).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased RNA fragmentation with the Cytolyt, RNA-seq data quality was comparable across Cytolyt and Ficoll-Hypaque methods. Both clearing methods are viable for short-read RNA-seq analysis, with read and UMI-based approaches performing similarly.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen malignant effusion specimens from metastatic breast cancer were processed using both the Ficoll-Hypaque and Cytolyt methods. RNA was extracted from fresh-frozen samples stored in RNA preservative and from cytospin slides fixed in Carnoy's solution. RNA quality was evaluated using RNA integrity number (RIN) and the percentage of fragments >200 bases (DV200). Sequencing was conducted with both read- and UMI-based methods.
RESULTS: Purified RNA was more fragmented by the Cytolyt method (mean RIN: 3.56, DV200: 78.97%), compared to the Ficoll-Hypaque method (mean RIN: 6.29, DV200: 88.08%). Sequencing data had high concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) for measurements of gene expression, whether from Cytolyt or Ficoll-Hypaque treated samples, and whether using the UMI- or read-based sequencing methods (read-based mean CCC: 0.967 from Cytolyt versus 0.974 from Ficoll-Hypaque, UMI-based mean CCC: 0.972 from Cytolyt versus 0.977 from Ficoll-Hypaque).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased RNA fragmentation with the Cytolyt, RNA-seq data quality was comparable across Cytolyt and Ficoll-Hypaque methods. Both clearing methods are viable for short-read RNA-seq analysis, with read and UMI-based approaches performing similarly.