Frailty in people 50 years or older living with HIV: A sex perspective.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To estimate prefrailty and frailty prevalence and associated factors in people living with HIV (PLHIV) from a sex perspective.
METHODS
Cross-sectional study on PLHIV at specialized public health centres in Brazil. Data were obtained from individuals aged ≥50 years using antiretroviral therapy (ART) and with an undetectable viral load through personal interviews, clinical evaluations and medical records. Frailty and prefrailty were characterized using the Fried Frailty Phenotype tool. Multinomial regression models were performed, and the associated factors were selected through the backward stepwise method.
RESULTS
Among 670 patients, 373 men and 297 women were included. The prevalence of frailty and prefrailty was significantly higher for women (16.2% and 56.2%, respectively) than for men (11.5% and 46.4%, respectively). Low socioeconomic and educational level, multimorbidity, depression, subjective cognitive complaints, and low scores on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) were associated (P < 0.05) with frailty for both sexes. However, in the sex-specific analysis, while smoking (OR = 3.66, 95% CI: 1.58-8.48) and a history of low adherence to ART (OR = 3.10, 95% CI: 1.33-7.23) were associated with frailty in men, depression (OR = 3.39, 95% CI: 1.36- 8.44) and the absence of functional dentition (OR = 3.77, 95% CI: 1.36- 10.43) were associated with frailty in women.
CONCLUSIONS
This study adds self-reported cognitive complaints as a potential predictor of frailty in both sexes and supports the known deleterious effect of multimorbidity on frailty in adults living with HIV. Furthermore, it suggests that other possible predictors, such as depression, oral health status and adherence to ART, may be sex-specific.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.